Selecting a web hosting service

Web Designs From Scratch has a near-realtime comparisons of hosting services' uptime and support.

This could prove quite helpful in selecting a web host.

While checking out web hosting companies recently, I noticed that it pays to carefully compare options by any one company. In one case, a Linux server hosting would get you a free blog or two compared to the Windows server option. But then you lost a feature or two that got offered with Windows hosting.

Also, make sure you check on whether web statistics come with a package or not.  You'll want the stats to help you learn where you are effective, what people are searching for, and more.

Finding a robust, easy CMS

Our church has been seeking a Content Management System (CMS) and new Web Hosting for over a year. The frustration is palpable.

In the process, though, we have come across a couple of very useful sites that let you compare CMS software features and even give them an online trial.

• CMS Matrix
• Open Source CMS

We have also had time to look closely at our list of required and desired Web Hosting features. While that list seemed great at the time, after looking at a feature comparison at CMS Matrix, we revised the list to add specifics about the CMS. The list below shows our current features list for both Web Hosting and a CMS.

Web Hosting

• Offers a Content Management System (CMS) and templates suitable for our church's use.
• The web hosting company must be an established one.
• 24 x 7 support. Email is OK, though phone is better.
• Hosting firm has good ratings (when I can find them).
• A very high percentage web server uptime.
• Web server operating system: Windows 2003 server, Linux, Unix, or Apache (needed for a lot of open source CMS solutions).
• The hosting package includes room for our web to grow (pages/disk space)
• Offers at least 30 email addresses, auto-forwarding, POP access, and Spam filtering.
• Hosting solution is $300 or less per year. (E-Zekiel is way out of our price range for the size web we have.)
• Domain name registration/renewal is inexpensive (these should be very low cost these days).

CMS

• The CMS should let nearly everyone (with minimal orientation) add, edit, or delete text, add or delete images, create or delete pages, and upload files. Templates must be pure CSS -- no use of tables for layout.
• Ability to directly edit the code as well as use a pure GUI.
• Must allow addition of alternate text and/or titles to image code (for accessibility).
• Ability to upload files via FTP or via Web.
• Absolutely no ads or forced frames with hosting company info showing.
• CMS templates must allow inserting of multiple-level menus -- horizontal or vertical or both. Pure CSS menus code is heavily preferred by Java is acceptable.
• The system requires email verification to activate a new account.
• Granular privileges by page or content item.
• Administrator can see who's logged in and disconnect the user if required.
• SSL logins and pages are possible.
• Versioning
• Good online help and developers forums.
• Drag-n-Drop of content
• The system lets you force friendly URLs, not database code characters for "page" URLs.
• Integrated Spell checking of content during editing.
• Users can subscribe to varied "pages" and receive email notification of changes.
• The Administrator can force a less advanced user interface for basic content editors.
• The system allows Undo of content changes.
• A WYSIWYG editor.
• You can schedule posting of content changes.
• The CMS allows sub-sites.
• The CMS provides Web-accessible statistics.
• Support for RSS.
• Support for iCal.
• Event management using the calendar.
• WAI compliant.
• XHTML compliant.
• Allows use of Metadata for content objects.
• Provides blogging capability.
• Provides Chat capability.
• An app to organize FAQs.
• Link management.
• Forms for email.
• Users can subscribe and unsubscribe themselves from email lists.
• Photo gallery.
• Polls.
• Surveys.
• Quizzes.
• Site search.
• Site Map.

Criteria for a new web host

Our church is looking at web hosting options. One criterion is to let an average person maintain the web. A second key criterion is to be able to "touch the code" if we have a person capable of doing that.

Below is the long list of criteria we're using to compare web hosting solutions and site builder type options:

• Offers a Content Management System (CMS) and templates suitable for our church's use. The CMS should let nearly everyone (with minimal orientation) add, edit, or delete text, add or delete images, create or delete pages, and upload files.Templates must be pure CSS -- no use of tables for layout.
• XHTML templates are preferred, though XML is OK as long as layout and CSS can be directly edited. (I'm resisting having to devote enough time to learn XML coding for very little benefit -- I won't use it at work, for example.)
  
• Ability to directly edit the code as well as use the CMS.
• Must allow addition of alternate text and/or titles to image code (for accessibility).
• Ability to upload files via FTP or via Web.
• Absolutely no ads or forced frames with hosting company info showing.
• Templates must allow inserting of multiple-level CSS fly-out menus -- horizontal or vertical or both. Single-level menus are not good enough, if we're going to improve the navigation, which we intend to do.
• The web hosting company must be an established one.
• 24 x 7 support. Email is OK, though phone is better.
• Hosting firm has good ratings (when I can find them).
• A very high percentage web server uptime.
• Offers hosting on Windows 2003 server (in order to keep our options open).
• The hosting package includes room for our web to grow (pages/disk space)
• Offers at least 30 email addresses, auto-forwarding, POP access, and Spam filtering.
• Hosting solution is $300 or less per year. (E-Zekiel is way out of our price range for the size web we have.)
• Domain name registration/renewal is inexpensive (these should be very low cost these days).

Optional, but desired features:

• Ability to upload and offer podcasts of sermons
• Ability to embed video (YouTube or similar)
• Ability to display RSS feeds on selected pages (like Blogger's new XML template system allows).