Picasa Web Albums vs. Flickr (free version)
- Picasa Web Albums offers 250MB storage space vs. only 20MB at Flickr
- Uploader: Picasa is more "fun" and attractive vs. Flickr Uploader. But Flick has tag-oriented input fields at upload time.
- Photo editing: Decent, free photo editing using Picasa. Flickr doesn't offer a photo editor.
- Slideshow: Picasa Web Albums gives a significantly larger photo view than Flickr's slideshow.
- Flickr lets you add rectangular hotspot "Notes" to any photos. I don't use this feature, but it is a difference between the two services.
Overall: I am using a paid Flickr account for my church, but will definitely give Picasa a try soon. Picasa Web Albums may become my preferred site for church galleries and slideshows.
But ... you knew there was a "but", didn't you! Picasa Web Albums is in beta testing (like a lot of the current Google projects). You must request an invitation and wait until Google gives you the "OK".
If you are just starting Web photo albums, want a free photo album site, and don't feel the need for blogging-related tags and such, Picasa may be perfect for your needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment